Animal Rights Groups Target Migros Ads.
A coalition of Swiss animal protection organisations is preparing to file a formal complaint against supermarket giant Migros, accusing the retailer of using misleading animal welfare advertising. The complaint is expected to be submitted to Switzerland’s Fair Trading Commission in the coming days.
The action is being led by Werbemist, an alliance that includes Animal Rights Switzerland, Sentience, the Fondation pour l’animal en droit (TIR), and Tier im Fokus (TIF). The organisations argue that Migros’ advertising slogan, “Always topical: animal welfare,” creates a misleading impression about conditions within livestock farming.
According to the alliance, significant animal welfare concerns continue to exist in modern farming practices. The groups highlight issues such as painful breastbone fractures in laying hens and the use of carbon dioxide stunning methods in pigs before slaughter. They claim that these practices raise serious ethical questions and conflict with the image presented in Migros marketing campaigns.
The complaint also argues that terms such as “animal welfare” and “animal-friendly” are not legally protected in Switzerland. As a result, companies can use these phrases in advertising even when animal rights groups believe the standards do not fully reflect consumer expectations. Activists describe this practice as “welfare washing,” comparing it to other forms of marketing that present a more positive image than reality.
Migros has strongly rejected the allegations. The company states that animal welfare remains a core commitment and that standards are regularly reviewed and improved. A company spokesperson emphasized that continuous monitoring and development are part of Migros’ long-term approach to responsible food production.
The retailer also noted that improving animal welfare across the agricultural sector requires cooperation between farmers, researchers, industry partners, and government authorities. Migros believes meaningful progress can only be achieved through collaboration rather than individual action.
The dispute has sparked renewed debate in Switzerland over transparency in food production, ethical farming practices, and how animal welfare claims should be communicated to consumers. The outcome of the complaint could have broader implications for advertising standards and consumer trust within the Swiss retail sector.

