judiciary - Swisstamil

Federal Court Judge Says Affair Was Not Illegal.

Swiss Federal Court judge Yves Donzallaz has publicly defended his past relationship with fellow judge Beatrice van de Graaf, stating that while the affair may have been inappropriate, it was not illegal under Swiss law.

In an interview with the Tamedia newspaper group, Donzallaz explained that the relationship, which lasted for nearly a year, never violated legal requirements governing members of Switzerland’s highest court. According to him, the relationship ended around Easter 2026 and never developed into a shared long-term living arrangement.

The controversy centers on provisions within the Federal Court Act that prohibit judges who are in a long-term cohabitation from serving on the same judicial panels. Donzallaz argued that the legal definition of cohabitation did not apply in their case because they did not share a residence or maintain a common household.

The judge stated that he and van de Graaf spent limited time together and never worked on the same judicial panel during their relationship. As a result, he believes there was no conflict of interest and no legal obligation to disclose the relationship.

The matter gained public attention after media reports revealed the relationship in April. In response, federal judges held an extraordinary meeting in May and concluded that romantic relationships between sitting members of the Federal Court are inconsistent with the court’s professional customs and ethical expectations.

An independent panel of experts is currently examining questions related to judicial independence and governance within Switzerland’s highest court. The panel is expected to submit its findings to the court’s Administrative Commission by the end of June.

Despite the controversy, Donzallaz has confirmed his intention to seek another term on the Federal Court for the 2027–2032 period. He maintains that he acted within the law and believes he has committed no wrongdoing. However, due to age limits, he would leave office in 2029 if re-elected.

The case has sparked a wider national debate about judicial transparency, ethics, and the balance between private life and public responsibility within Switzerland’s legal system.

Admin Swiss news courtcontroversy ethics federalcourt judges judicialindependence judiciary legalnews politics society swissnews switzerland

Court Bans In-Office Judge Romance

Switzerland’s highest judicial body has ruled that romantic relationships between federal judges are incompatible with the court’s professional standards and judicial customs.

The decision was made during an extraordinary meeting of all members of the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland on Wednesday following public attention surrounding a relationship between two federal judges.

The controversy emerged after reports revealed a relationship between federal judge Beatrice van de Graaf and federal judge Yves Donzallaz. The matter became public in April through reporting by the German-language publication Weltwoche.

According to a statement released by the Federal Court, judges are expected to avoid behaviour that could raise concerns about their independence, impartiality, or the reputation of the judiciary.

The court announced that an independent panel of experts will examine the specific case involving the two judges. An external specialist has been tasked with clarifying the facts and reporting findings to the Administrative Commission of the Federal Court.

Officials stated that the investigation results are expected by the end of June, after which the court will decide on any further action.

While the inquiry into the individual case remains ongoing, the court separately confirmed that romantic relationships between members of the court are fundamentally considered incompatible with current judicial conduct standards.

The development has sparked debate in Switzerland regarding judicial ethics, independence, and personal conduct within the country’s highest legal institutions.